UXDLAB SOFTWARE

Google

The Key Differences Between Android Go Apps and Regular Apps

It was at its I/O Conference in 2017 that Google had initially made an announcement to introduce Android Go, that would run seamlessly on low-budget or cost-efficient Android devices. Google launched the Android Go to basically target the common users, who don’t use highly expensive Smartphones and aimed to expand its app market in the developing nations. Well, those not familiar with this lighter or the slimmed down version of Android should look at the following definition. What is Android Go? The Android Go is the slimmed down version of the Android Operating System released by Google with the aim to run the OS successfully on entry-level phones. As the numbers of smartphones are skyrocketing globally, this is a masterstroke from Google to expand its business strategy. Android Go allows all the Google based apps to occupy very little storage space. Thus, it is said to be a blessing for devices that have low RAM size. Even the preinstalled apps will also consume less data and space. Google while launching the Android Go has intently focused on three major areas including the Play Store, the Operating System and the Apps. Let’s have a close examination of each of these: The Android Go Play Store In order to make the Android lightweight and to reduce the burden of the apps, Google also unveiled a new and exclusive Android Go Play Store. Truly speaking, there’s not much of a difference between the normal Google Play Store and the Android Go Play Store as both provide more or less the same content. The only difference is that the Android Go Play Store offers a storefront that can fit best for the entry-level devices. It also helps in recommending the users the top apps that can run flawlessly on their devices and enhancing their experiences. The Apps Google has launched the same apps as found in the regular version but with the light version to suit the device’s memory. These apps mostly occupy about 50% less space and provide the same experience performance-wise as in the case of usual apps. With Android Go, you would basically come across these common preinstalled apps such as Google Go, Gmail Go, YouTube Go, Google Maps Go, Google Assistant Go and Files Go etc. The apps can be navigated at a much faster speed almost by 15%. However, you might have to compromise with some of their features that are no available in the Go version. It must be noted that most of the pre-existing apps in Android Go are Progressive Web Apps. Operating System The Operating System is based on the model same as the Android Oreo but it has been specifically designed to support devices that have RAM ranging from 512 MB to 1GB. In fact, they occupy half the space of Android Nougat, which lets the smartphone install and use more number of apps. The Android Go has one additional feature known as the data saver available in the default mode helping to consume lesser data. The Difference Between Android Go and Regular Android Let’s start with the comparative analysis between the regular Android and Android Go by focusing on some of the key apps. Beginning with Google and Google Go When you have the first look at the Google Go, you would find it simple and lighter, which is much easier to install. The most significant part of the slimmed down version is that the app size; which is only about 12 MB; whereas the regular Google occupies a large space of around 166 MB. The intensely vast difference in file size of the app also saves a lot of time while downloading or updating the app. It comprises of all important features such as voice search, Google Translate, Maps and GIF. However, the feature Google Feed remains absent here but you should be happier to receive such a compressed size of the app. Gmail Go and Regular Gmail People with low-priced smartphones also find it much convenient to check and reply their emails using their devices. So, Google has facilitated such users with the Gmail Go, which performs the same function as a normal Gmail app. Yes, you can easily access your mails from anywhere anytime with just a tap on the button. To tell you more about it, the Gmail Go have a file size of about 24.8 MB to be precise and even if you compare it with regular Gmail app on the grounds of RAM consumption, it takes up 77MB in comparison to a whooping 260 MB. Moreover, the interface of the Go version remains more or less the same and it provides all the features including the swipe gestures. Comparing Google Map Go with Google Map Well, it is interesting to note that the APK size (Android Package Kit) of the Google Go Map is merely 0.009 MB. On the other hand, if you compare it with the normal Google Maps, then the size would become as large as 48 MB. Yes, it cannot be called humongous; but comparatively there is a massive difference between the sizes of the two apps. One of the most common features that Google Go Maps share with their regular contemporary is offering the facility of real-time location sharing. However, you would also be disappointed to note that the Google Go Maps do not offer the benefit of navigation. It means that if you have to find out the right direction, user has to install another app called “Navigation for Google Maps Go” to use navigation in Android Go. But the fact that it offers you information about the traffic condition will help you in planning your journey in advance according to the traffic movements. Even in RAM consumption the Go version consumes only 3.5 MB in comparison to 183 MB for regular Google Maps. Comparison of YouTube Go with YouTube YouTube is perhaps the most visited video sharing app today and also has become one of the major sources of entertainment for

The Key Differences Between Android Go Apps and Regular Apps Read More »

To Go or Not to: the Pros and Cons of Programming in GoLang

‘Google’ of modern times has transcended itself in being versatile and more than just a search engine. It has penetrated the world of web services, information, entertainment and communication to deliver solutions that are a technological marvel each. Amid this surge, it has also not forgotten to contribute to the rising need for software productivity – the fine balance between the quantity of software developed and cost incurred. Conceived in 2007, GoLang counts as one of Google’s many such breakthrough initiatives which have made the world of programming a lot simpler. A Little History of GoLang The idea for this open-source programming language came up when Google engineers Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, and Ken Thompson huddled together to create a systems level language. The focus was on resolving the difficulties of other programming languages in writing codes without doing away with their characteristic features. Accordingly, GoLang bases on the classic syntax of C/C++ with added benefits of garbage collection, memory safety, automatic declaration of variables, structural typing, and CSP-style concurrency. This is also the latest programming language that keeps multi-threading at its core. With the whip hand over its competitors, GoLang has meteorically risen up the Tiobe Index – one that indicates programmer preferences and favorites. No wonder it is being used in diverse applications worldwide, including Dropbox, SoundCloud, Cloud Foundry any many others! The question is, is GoLang really worthwhile? What makes it better than stalwarts like C, C++, Java and Python? Why choose it at all? Let’s find out the pros and cons of it. Simplicity and Ease of Use Pro: The simplest reason to start programming in GoLang is its simplicity. The syntax is extremely small and easy to learn. Because its core resembles that of C/C++, experienced programmers can pick up the basics fast. Although it lacks the functionality of other programming languages, its scope has been deliberately limited to keep it simple. Furthermore, for those trying and failing at multithreading codes, GoLang is a safe haven for background coding tasks. Con: Although simple to use, GoLang makes room for undisciplined coding. Also, this simplicity, which the language flaunts, can become an obstacle when a project matures into something bigger. It would then be unwise to ignore the other cleverer programming languages that have better bug-fighting abilities. For those looking for generics, exceptions and extensibility this programming language would be disappointed. Virtual Machine Dependencies Pro: Regarding virtual machine dependencies, GoLang offers peace of mind. Codes written with this programming language are complied into a binary that is ready to go and doesn’t need a virtual machine. Simply enter the executable’s name in the command line and hit Return. In short, dependencies are not an issue with GoLang because it comes with a dependency manager. As virtual machines are not involved in running codes, any software developed using this programming language would feed on fewer resources. Above all, GoLang enables faster debugging cycles. Con: The standalone binaries of GoLang are huge because they need to include the power of the virtual machine as well. Even a small ‘hello world’ might eat up 2MB of data. Of course, much has been done to compress the binaries by excluding uncalled methods. Still and all, the RAM might end up clogging when a server fires up multiple versions of your code. Furthermore, GoLang allows dependencies to be expressed within the same file that contains the dependent code. Although this is a good thing, no programmer can indicate a specific version of the dependencies. The task is restricted to the latest version, also known as the master branch. This eventually causes errors, including the breaking of codes because of dependency alteration. Automation Pro: As discussed earlier, GoLang comes with features like automatic declaration of variables, fast compile times, and latency free garbage collection. It completely keeps away manual memory management. Such automation eventually saves time. Con: Ask any programmer and he would tell you about the pitfalls of using automation features in programming languages. What if garbage collection is triggered at the wrong time leading to errors and delay in server code responses? What if the same variable name gets used in nested scopes and automatic declarations goof it up? Imagine the chaos! Doesn’t the belts-and-suspenders approach seem more logical? Classic Syntax of C Pro: C lovers consider GoLang to be the next update. Carrying the classic syntax, this programming language has everything that reminds you of C, of course, without the annoyances. Features like latency free garbage collection and a simpler file structure make the difference. Everything else is quintessentially C! Con: There are other programming languages as well that resemble C. Consider the likes of Java, Swift, Rust, C#, C++, and even Objective-C. Moreover, programming isn’t only about defining basic blocks in compiler construction or fancying curly braces. And even if it is, other programming languages have so much more to offer. Syntax Libraries Pro: GoLang has some standard libraries with built-in functionality that lets programmers write code quickly. These libraries are updated and ready to go – a plus point for conservative developments. Con: Despite the fresh libraries, GoLang lags behind because most programming languages are already ahead of it. When old is gold, why would people want to bet on something so nascent? In a Nutshell… Things You’ll Love About GoLang: It’s simple and compiles at ninja speed. Programs can be edited and run directly on the web. Memory management isn’t a problem as this is a garbage collected language. It’s the only programming language that has a standard library with a fully working web server. It is supported by Google and enables large-scale software engineering. Things You’ll Hate About GoLang: It’s a relatively new language with not many libraries or information. Its simplicity seems superficial because of its internal inconsistencies. With limited scope, automation can invite errors. It’s got defective dependency management. It’s a high-level language with low-level features. To be honest, GoLang is something that would shatter you and still satisfy you. Blog Source-

To Go or Not to: the Pros and Cons of Programming in GoLang Read More »